|
|
|
| Autopsy Report Log of experiences as a Medical Examiner Intern |
|
Saturday, August 02, 2003 Thursday proved to be an interesting day and it had nothing to do with the cases. The cases that we did have were another homicide and an alcoholic. The homicide was two shots from a handgun, one in the chest and one in the abdomen. The alcoholic was a decomp. He wasn't too far along. He had the green marbling effect on his body and he was getting kind of stinky. The green marbling effect was aided by his jaundice. The jaundice was due to his alcoholism and basically makes the skin appear yellow to yellow-green. The combination of decomp and jaundice coloring made this guy look like the Hulk. Jaundice is usually a good sign that the liver is having some troubles, and sure enough, his liver wasn't in good shape. His liver was a yellowish color when it should have been the color of a Hershey bar. The liver also had the start of cirrhosis, which is when scar tissue replaces healthy tissue and the liver becomes fibrotic. Thursday, July 31, 2003 There are a few common questions that I get asked when I tell people that I am interning in the morgue. The first most common question is: "What is the most disgusting/gruesome/grossest/etc. thing that you have seen?" Another common question is: "Doesn't it make you sad or depressed seeing all those dead people?" With that question people like to toss around the words "innocent" and "tragedy." Another very common question I get asked is: "Do you ever lose your appetite? or Do you ever feel like throwing up?" I think I will address this third question because its fun to relate food and pathology. Tuesday, July 29, 2003 Yay, another berry aneurysm today. Also a bike rider who was hit by a car and a man who died in his burning house. This guy was alive when the fire was burning. There was soot in the lungs and he had a high amount of carbon monoxide in his blood. This made his livor mortis (the small amount you could see under the soot and burnt skin) more pink instead of the usual purple tinge. The blood was also a very bright red instead of the very dark (almost black) red that is normally found in non-burn cases. The bright color of the blood is caused by the carbon monoxide. Seems like I jinxed myself by reading a book about maggots. A body was brought in and autopsied over the weekend that was very much infested with maggots. The interesting thing about this body was that it was decapitated and the hands were removed. This, along with the cut up area where there once was a tattoo, was probably the killer's way of thwarting attempts to identify the body. Now the body was so badly decomposed that race and age are difficult to determine. The initial estimates are that the body was only in the woods for two or three days. It is hard to explain without pictures, but take my word for it that decomposition aided by maggots progresses very quickly. As I have mentioned before, decomposition makes an autopsy very difficult. There is not much that can be gained by fishing through the green soupy decomp fluid and mushing around the unidentifiable organs. That is why the forensic anthropologist visited again today to look at the bones. He looks at the ribs, pubic symphysis, leg bones, and arm bones to get an idea of race, age, and stature. This will then help police match the body to any recent or upcoming missing persons reports. That would be a good lead and could then be confirmed with DNA analysis. For example, if a mother reported her daughter missing, then DNA would be collected from the body and from the biological mother to see if there is a match. The scene itself had all sorts of flesh and entrails in the vicinity. Most likely they are deer entrails from hunters (I don't know too much about hunting or why hunters would leave entrails scattered around). Since the entrails were in the vicinity of the scene, then like any good forensic investigation, those entrails must be examined. Unfortunately for us, the ME is the one who is chosen to examine those very stinky pieces of deer flesh and guts. I guess the thought process is that the deer may have inadvertinly eaten something that may have been a clue or possibly the deer guts may have been part of the crime itself. Who knows, if it is in the scene of the crime, it must me investigated. Did I mention that they were stinky? I couldn't tell which smelled worse, the headless and handless maggot-infested body or the deer guts. It was like the two smells were having a war and they both were winning. |
|
||||